Home · EU AI Act · Articles · Article 11
EU AI Act · Engineering reference

Article 11 — Technical Documentation

Technical documentation per Annex IV must demonstrate the system meets Articles 9-15 requirements and be available to authorities for ten years post-placing-on-market.

Audit-survivable
22%
of 50 EU-exposed enterprises in MindMap's 2026 readiness benchmark

What the Article requires

Article 11 requires providers to draw up technical documentation before placing the high-risk AI system on the market. The documentation must include everything in Annex IV — system description, design, components, training data, intended use, performance metrics, risk-management system, evaluation procedures, post-market monitoring plan. It must be kept up to date and made available to national competent authorities on request for ten years.

In engineering terms

The Annex IV format is the single biggest documentation discipline most enterprises don't have today. Most existing system documentation is fragmented across architecture decisions, runbooks and READMEs; restructuring it into the Annex IV format is largely translation work. MindMap maintains an Annex IV template that takes typical enterprise system documentation and restructures it — saves substantial time vs writing from scratch.

Compliance checklist

  • ✓Annex IV-format technical documentation drafted
  • ✓System description, design, intended use captured
  • ✓Training-data sources, quality, preparation documented
  • ✓Performance, accuracy, robustness, cybersecurity evidence
  • ✓Document control with version history and update process
  • ✓10-year retention plan

Terms used here

EU AI ActAnnex III high-risk AI

All Articles in the reference · The EU AI Act compliance architecture

Need audit-survivable evidence for Article 11?

MindMap runs a 90-day path from standing start to audit-survivable evidence. Talk to the engineering team.

Download the whitepaper →Check your tier →Book a scoping call →