NEWMindMap Digital has acquired Bluetide.co— deepening our data & agentic-AI stack.Read more →
Home · Customer Stories · European Government
Government · Europe

Policy Intelligence at a European Government — LLM-Powered Analysis Across 14 Policy Domains

Enterprise Knowledge Engine + Summarization Wizard + Policy Q&A Agent supporting cross-domain policy analysis at a European government.

14
Policy domains on-platform
40w
Delivery duration
On-Premises
Deployment
4
Accelerators used
On-PremisesEuropean Government — 14 Policy domains on-platform
14
Policy domains on-platform
240K+
Policy documents indexed
Sovereign
On-prem deployment
Full
Provenance on every answer
In this storyGovernmentPolicySovereign AIOn-PremisesEurope
01
The challenge

The challenge

The client — a European national government's central policy-coordination unit responsible for cross-ministry policy analysis and the briefing-support function for senior ministers — was operating an analysis function whose effectiveness was structurally limited by the scale of the underlying policy corpus. The relevant policy material spanned 14 policy domains, more than 240,000 policy documents (legislation, regulatory instruments, policy papers, ministerial speeches, parliamentary committee outputs, comparable jurisdiction reference material), and a continuous flow of new material.

The analyst team — approximately 80 policy analysts across the 14 domains — was structurally unable to maintain comprehensive depth across the corpus. Cross-domain policy analysis (the work that the central coordination unit existed to do) frequently required policy analysts to consult colleagues in other domains, with the cross-domain knowledge-transfer happening through ad-hoc consultation rather than through systematic retrieval. Senior-minister briefing preparation typically required several days of analyst work assembling the relevant material, often with the cross-domain depth that ministers needed being delivered after the briefing window had passed.

The constraints were severe. The policy material included substantial sensitive content (pre-publication policy proposals, parliamentary-confidential material, inter-governmental correspondence) that could not leave the government's controlled infrastructure. The analyst-team's accountability for the policy-advice content meant any LLM-supported analysis had to be grounded in citable source material — analyst-team members would not endorse model-generated advice without explicit source-provenance. The government's data-strategy posture required alignment with the national sovereign-AI framework.

02
The approach

The approach

MindMap deployed a policy-intelligence platform composed of Enterprise Knowledge Engine (Ke) as the sovereign-knowledge-and-RAG backbone, Summarization Wizard (Sw) for the policy-summarisation-and-briefing-assembly layer, Policy Q&A Agent (Pq) for the cross-domain policy-question-answering layer, and Sovereign LLM Platform (Sl) for the on-premises model serving.

Phase one was the policy-corpus ingestion. The 240,000+ policy documents across the 14 domains were ingested into the platform's structured knowledge base, with per-domain ingestion workflows that respected each domain's document-handling conventions and access-restriction patterns. The continuous-flow ingestion handles the new material as it arrives, with material-classification routing each document to the appropriate access-restriction tier.

Phase two was the cross-domain knowledge-graph build. The platform's knowledge graph models the policy concepts, the legislative-and-regulatory references, the cross-domain policy-relationships, the historical policy-evolution and the comparable-jurisdiction reference material. The graph enables cross-domain queries that the per-domain document corpora could not support directly.

Phase three was the analyst-workflow integration. Policy analysts use the platform's conversational interface to query the policy corpus, with the platform's responses grounded in citable source-material and the cross-domain reasoning explicit. The Summarization Wizard component supports the briefing-assembly workflow — producing draft briefings with the underlying source-material citations that the analyst confirms or modifies.

Phase four was the senior-minister briefing-support layer. The platform supports the briefing-preparation workflow for senior-minister engagements — assembling the relevant cross-domain material, drafting the briefing structure, surfacing the analyst-team's recent thinking on the relevant topics — with the senior-minister briefing maintaining the analyst-team's accountability for the briefing content.

Accelerators in this engagement

The pre-built building blocks

Rather than commission a ground-up build, the engagement leaned on MindMap's pre-built accelerator library — production-tested components that compress what would otherwise be a six-to-nine-month build into weeks.

Ke

Enterprise Knowledge Engine

Sovereign knowledge-and-RAG backbone with access-restriction tiers

Sw

Summarization Wizard

Policy-summarisation-and-briefing-assembly layer

Pq

Policy Q&A Agent

Cross-domain policy-question-answering layer with provenance

Sl

Sovereign LLM Platform

On-prem Llama 3.1 serving with policy-corpus fine-tuning

03
The architecture

The architecture

The platform runs entirely on the government's on-premises infrastructure inside the central data centre, with the access-restriction tiers enforced at the storage-and-compute layer. The sensitive material is processed only on the tiers where the appropriate access-restriction applies; the platform's user-and-role model enforces the per-tier access-control.

Sovereign LLM Platform serves Llama 3.1 70B-Instruct fine-tuned on the policy-corpus content (with appropriate handling of the access-restriction tiers — the fine-tuning corpus is drawn from the less-restricted tiers, with the restricted-tier material accessed at inference time through the access-controlled RAG layer rather than embedded in model weights).

Enterprise Knowledge Engine handles the sovereign-knowledge-and-RAG backbone. The policy corpus is indexed using a combination of classical full-text search (BM25 for the structured-term queries) and embedding-based semantic search (for the policy-concept-and-relationship queries). The knowledge graph supplements the document-based retrieval with the cross-domain policy-relationship navigation.

Policy Q&A Agent's reasoning layer combines the retrieval results with the LLM-generated reasoning to produce structured policy-question answers with explicit source-provenance. Each answer surfaces the underlying source documents (with the document title, the relevant excerpt, the publication date, the authoring body) that support the answer, allowing the analyst to validate the reasoning against the citable material.

Summarization Wizard supports the briefing-assembly workflow with policy-summary generation grounded in the underlying source-material. The generated briefings include source-citation per substantive claim, ensuring the analyst-team's accountability for the content is preserved.

The outcomes

The numbers behind the story

14
Policy domains on-platform
240K+
Policy documents indexed
Sovereign
On-prem deployment
Full
Provenance on every answer

Policy analyst productivity on cross-domain analysis has improved approximately 3-4x against the pre-platform baseline. The reduction is concentrated in the cross-domain source-material assembly work that the platform's retrieval-and-summarisation now handles, with the analyst's time redirected to the genuine policy-analysis-and-judgement work that the role exists for.

Senior-minister briefing-preparation time has dropped substantially. Briefings that previously required several days of analyst work can now be drafted in hours, allowing more-responsive briefing-support and supporting senior-minister engagement at the cadence that current policy-making requires.

Cross-domain policy insight has improved as a strategic outcome. The platform's knowledge-graph-enabled cross-domain queries have surfaced policy-interaction patterns that the previous domain-siloed analysis had not been able to identify, with the central coordination unit's cross-ministry policy-advice quality materially improved.

Provenance has been preserved throughout. Every platform-generated answer or briefing carries the underlying source-material citation, allowing the analyst-team to validate the content and preserving the analyst-team's accountability for the policy advice. No platform output is endorsed without analyst-team review and the analyst's professional sign-off.

An unexpected outcome: the platform has become a basis for new-analyst onboarding. The platform's cross-domain policy-knowledge depth supports new analysts in coming up to speed on the policy domains they are entering, materially compressing the onboarding-time that the unit's traditional apprenticeship-based onboarding had required.

Cross-domain policy analysis at scale had been the structural limitation on our central coordination function. MindMap's platform has changed the productivity of our policy-analyst team and the responsiveness of our senior-minister briefing support, with full sovereign on-premises deployment and the provenance-by-design approach that our analyst-team's accountability requires.
Director, Central Policy Coordination· European Government
04
Why MindMap was chosen

Why MindMap was chosen

The government had evaluated two global enterprise-AI vendors. Both required cloud-hosted deployments that the government's data-handling posture did not permit. The previous in-house knowledge-management work had assembled the policy-corpus indexing but had not delivered the LLM-driven reasoning that the analyst-team needed.

MindMap's accelerator-composition approach — bringing Enterprise Knowledge Engine, Summarization Wizard, Policy Q&A Agent and Sovereign LLM Platform together with the fully on-premises deployment, the access-restriction-tier enforcement and the provenance-by-design approach — was the structural differentiator.

Our embedded sovereign-AI expertise on the delivery team (two former sovereign-AI architects from peer European governments and a former policy-analysis senior analyst) was the third factor. The government's leadership felt that the team understood the public-sector and policy-analysis realities of the engagement.

Want an outcome like this?

Start with a 2-week AI Readiness Sprint. We deliver a prioritised use-case backlog and business case grounded in what's actually buildable with our accelerator library.

Book a walkthrough →Explore Government
Talk to the product team